Search for: "People v High"
Results 101 - 120
of 13,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
The moral stakes are simply too high -- both for the innocent people wasting away on death row and for the society that put them there. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 8:35 am
Today's majority opinion in People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:44 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the Arizona high court ruled in State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:34 am
What about this statute: "The Legislature finds that people who have assaulted someone recently are at a higher danger of assaulting others in jail and need to be segregated. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 7:18 am
Circuit indicated that over 1,500 people listened to the July 12, 2019, oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:00 pm
Unable to really handle high school. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:57 am
This is a lengthy, published opinion that exclusively involves whether it really costs $475 -- the amount of the restitution order at issue -- to paint over a profane, 80 foot long, five-foot high piece of spray-painted graffiti on the wall of a childhood development center.The Court of Appeal, along with the trial court, concluded that it was. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:45 pm
High Desert State Prison -- where he's currently incarcerated -- seems about the right place for him. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:01 pm
The guy's driving in a high-crime area and "was wearing baggy clothing. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:27 pm
For example, for all of the high-profile commentary and precedent about the wisdom and validity of the federal sentencing guidelines, far too often overlooked is what happens in California. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:18 am
Tinker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
He pointed to the high-profile Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
He was taking a high dose of the medication, which caused him to have more sexual impulses. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:27 am
The UK High Court ruled Tuesday that the Secretary of State for the Home Office unlawfully operated a “secret policy” that saw more than 1,500 people who were the victims of modern slavery denied leave to remain. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:23 am
But I think that what has gotten me where I am today is the attitude of optimisim v pessimism. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
“A strict observance of the written law is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Without some context, it WILL freak people out.] [read post]
