Search for: "People v I. S."
Results 101 - 120
of 39,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2021, 3:40 pm
Thank goodness.The lesson that I get from today's Court of Appeal opinion is the following: Don't buy stuff online unless it's from a well-known seller (e.g., amazon). [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
Well, maybe I’m not that surprised people are still suing the site if it’s still around. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Here's one jury I won't be on. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
People repeatedly complain about cases being resolved on meaningless "technicalities". [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 12:30 pm
So if that's indicative, I'd say that Black Friday is going strong. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 2:49 pm
I expect that there are lots of "normal" people, like me, who violate it. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:18 pm
I'm shocked -- shocked -- to find that people who meet each other at a hookah lounge occasionally arrange to buy and sell marijuana.I'm am (no joke) surprised to read that it results in a murder. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 1:40 pm
I'd much prefer you steal manhole covers, thank you very much. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
(People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
I couldn't figure why people were making such a big deal out of this whole thing; jury trial, appeal to the appellate division, onto the Court of Appeal, etc. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 11:57 am
Which I guess is fine (?) [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So I looked up whether other people (judges, anyway) say the same thing. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:45 pm
But notice that the caption is "People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
For example, we exclude lots of truthful evidence when there's a violation of Miranda, and I personally think that opinion advances the interests of justice. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 11:43 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 2:15 pm
(People v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
"Which is, I guess, theoretically true -- once the California Supreme Court decides something, barring its reconsideration of this issue, the only thing left is to ask the Legislature to change the law.But I'm fairly sure that the class of people who drive drunk and kill people don't exactly have awesome lobbyists in the California Legislature. [read post]
