Search for: "People v Jones (John)" Results 101 - 120 of 502
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 6:20 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
Chief Justice John Roberts begins his questioning with a clarification: does Congress ever have power to subpoena the personal papers of the president? [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
” Chief Justice John Roberts kicked off the questioning by asking Strawbridge to clarify his argument: Does Trump contend that that the House of Representatives can never subpoena the president’s personal papers, or does he agree that it might have the power to do so in at least some cases? [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) Responses John Hart Ely, The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost, Justice Donovan, and Justice Wise 309 OPINION John Donovan, Justice. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
There was an article in the Guardian by columnist Owen Jones “What my attacker’s conviction taught me about taking on the far right”. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Lanter, 2020 ONSC 205 awarding damages against 10 “John Doe” defendants in respect of defamatory internet posts. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The BBC had a piece “Alex Jones ordered to pay $100,000 in Sandy Hook defamation case”. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Justices Felix Frankfurter and John Marshall Harlan, who were very historically minded, opposed incorporation on that ground. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the 6 December 2016 Channel 4 News has issued an apology after a subtitling error wrongly claimed Boris Johnson had discussed whether “people of colour” should be allowed into the UK, in reality, Johnson said he was in favour of having “people of talent” come to the UK, and did not discuss race. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Court also described the award of damages – for an email sent to 16 people – as “manifestly excessive” and said no more than $25,000 would have been appropriate. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 November 2019 the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) heard the appeal in the case of W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants. [read post]