Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 101 - 120
of 23,024
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 8:40 pm
However, in Cargill v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:32 pm
(People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:05 pm
(People v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
People reading the opinion will, I think, generally have the same reaction as Justice Bedsworth (and the rest of the panel) did: Lock him up. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:16 am
In People v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:33 pm
King (7th Cir. 2003) 349 F.3d 964 (King) and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 11:43 pm
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:02 pm
I think that's why the question of Justice Ginsburg's recusal in a hypothetical Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
See Graham v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 5:35 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:19 am
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in DC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
But shortly thereafter, the United States Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
So is Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye's concurrence (joined by three other justices). [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:34 pm
I'm not one of those people who bend over backwards doctrinally to let people represent themselves or do whatever idiotic thing comes into their head at trial. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm
Some people call him a “gun nut. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm
Some people call him a “gun nut. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 2:28 pm
Becker (Trinity College Dublin - Law) has posted Crisis in Gaza: South Africa v Israel at the International Court of Justice (or the Unbearable Lightness of Provisional Measures) (Melbourne Journal of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:57 am
With all due respect to both participants, I think that Justice Motoike's majority opinion fairly clearly wins the argument over Justice Moore's dissent. [read post]