Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,802
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am
REASONS FOR THE JUDGMENT The elements of the defence of fair comment had been set out by Lord Nicholls in the Hong Kong case of Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] EMLR 777. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
Palantir Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:18 am
On appeal from: [2015] CSIH 64 The Supreme Court has unanimously allowed the appeal, in a case where four registered charities with interests in family matters and three individual parents challenged the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2012, which made provision for a named person to be assigned to each child and young person in Scotland. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:38 am
The case was heard before Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge on 12 Dec 2017. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:30 am
Stage 1: Entitled Expectation Lord Tyre considered the leading authorities on the issue of “defect” under the CPA, namely Wilkes v DePuy International Limited [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB) and Gee and Ors v DePuy International Limited [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Burnip v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:24 am
However, the Scottish court found that such an interference was justified as compensating people who develop pleural plaques was a legitimate aim. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 12:29 am
Press), examines the 1963 case, Abington v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
What needs to be said, however, is that Lord Diplock's comments in Star Industrial Co Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor further support Lord Neuberger's conclusions and highlight the distinction between goodwill in different jurisdictions through the existence of separation of judiciaries; i.e. not one court can decide an issue of a foreign court. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am
As an adult, he was frequently called Ke Ali‘i Maka‘āinana (Prince of the People), for the services he gave to the Hawaiian people. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Only ‘a real risk’, rather than ‘conclusive evidence’ of persons being prevented from having access to justice needed to be proven, and the sharp, substantial and sustained fall in the number of claims warranted the conclusion that a significant number of people who would otherwise have brought claims have found the fees to be unaffordable. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Isn't it wrong for me to change my opinion simply because one of the victims stiffed a drug lord? [read post]
