Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm
On the moment the news broke about Roe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
The bishops also apologised for the rejection, exclusion and hostility that LGBTQI+ people have faced in some of our churches. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
The ICO concluded that there is always meaningful human involvement in the decision-making process but recommended that local authorities identify risks to people’s privacy, maintain transparency and ensure GDPR compliance. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:24 pm
While the lift was an essential installation for the occupants, this was the basis on which the House of Lords had implied a contractual term to keep the lift in repair in Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977) AC 239, but that did not put it under s.11. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:36 pm
From Corso Ventures LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
Lord Faulks KC, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), told the BBC World at One that “most people don’t want anybody to know anything about their private life, but if they are prepared to discuss it then it is not unreasonable for the press to write about it. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
From Michigan Supreme Court Justice Bridget McCormack's majority opinion (for four of the seven Justices) delivered Thursday in People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Following changes to social distancing provisions in Wales, it was legal for only 50 fans to attended a Welsh rugby match outside, but 140 people watched it indoors from the clubhouse on Boxing Day. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
Lord and undeposable ruler, perfection in the house of wisdom, Lord infinite in knowledge, we who fail to know you fully will fail, if we could but know you fully, all would be well with us.] [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Quick links Anon, European Times: Patriarchate of Constantinople won a case in Strasbourg for church property in Istanbul: on Arnavutkoy Greek Orthodox Taksiarhis Church Foundation v Turkey [2022] ECHR 1001, which we noted here. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Interestingly, it is this last work—counselling “firm rule over people”—which grounds the insurgent common good constitutionalism, the New Right’s substantive legal theory. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
From Corso Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 3:21 pm
" Truax v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
The AG’s opinion certainly reads like he closely studied, and perhaps sought inspiration from, Lord Leggatt’s leading judgment in Lloyd v Google (see our analysis of that decision here). [read post]
