Search for: "People v Marti"
Results 101 - 120
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
This weblog has been existence for getting on for 12 years and many people erroneously assume that it was the first intellectual property weblog. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am
Charbucks case (decision here, posted by Marty; the real name of the case is Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
Marty Schwimmer didn’t; he reported on the first newsworthy development, the denial of a TRO to Charriol, way back in June of 2013. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:15 pm
We are skeptical that Heckler v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
At its heart, it’s not an interpretation of the INA, as Marty Lederman contends, but an end-run around statutory limits. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
In Weber v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 10:55 pm
For a copy of the complaint, click here to see Natl Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:32 pm
Last week, in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
I think it is fair to say that a lot of people thought that was all the statute did. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:26 pm
[Update: see Marty Lederman's post speculating about the next case.] [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
He predicts that, “[e]ither way . . . , the Supreme Court’s ruling . . . could drive more people to cut the cord. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:33 pm
The editors want to expand the conversation to include citizens as well as law students in order to empower people to speak up against perceived prejudice and unfairness. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Massey Housing America’s Native People Wendy L. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:32 am
It's chock full of analysis of the Bebchuk v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am
In Estate of Thornton v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Just see Wells v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
This leap in the tailoring requirement is often ignored, because people are taken in by the statute’s title and the fact it invokes a “return” to Sherbert v. [read post]
