Search for: "People v Osgood" Results 101 - 120 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
" ruling in Thuiskopie v Opus for jiplp. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(IP Osgoode) SMEs and the struggle against patent trolls (IAM) Firebox Inventor innovative product competition: not such a good idea after all? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
(IP Dragon) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court:Konica’s claim dismissed: Konica Minolta Holdings Inc v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Jennifer Leitch (Osgoode): “Taking Self-Represented Litigants Seriously: The Collective Responsibility of the Legal Profession” The access to justice conversation is among academics and regulators; it is not yet a live conversation among real lawyers Few people in this room (filled with relatively well-heeled professionals) would be able to afford a lawyer representing them in litigation. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
The People) US Trade Marks & Domain Names Lessons in smart trademark management: Free licensing of the mark from Twitter (Techdirt) [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Lots of people have campaigned against it – smart people w… 2018-09-11 RT @Soc_of_Authors: Here are the key arguments we’re hearing against the directive, and why we think they’re misleading: 2018-09-11 Europe’s chance to write the music for a generation https://t.co/JRtHaykSBp 2018-09-11 The end of Kodi add-ons? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Intangible assets: The 900 pound overlooked economic gurerrilla… (Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) Global – Patents Do poor people like different patents to rich people? [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
In today’s case (Wallman v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection London company Pension House Exchange (PHE) has been fined £45,000 for making more than 39,000 nuisance calls to people about their pensions. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(IP tango)   Canada Revisiting the utility requirement (IP Osgoode) Balanced Copyright in Canada (IPKat) Vogue after charity for ‘Fashions Night Out’ – infringement of Vogue’s trade mark (IPKat)   China Ms Pagnattaro does not keep it a secret how to protect your trade secret in China (IP Dragon) China intellectual property theft. [read post]