Search for: "People v Sutton"
Results 101 - 120
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
Croteau More Blog Entries: Floyd-Tunnell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
In dissent, Judge Jeffrey Sutton called bullshit. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
The facts and the law In Ocasio v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Beginning with Sutton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
It says: “browsewrap agreements” … are generally considered to be enforceable contracts And courts in Canada typically uphold and enforce Terms of Use (or website browsewrap agreements) So far as I know, Canadian courts have upheld browsewrap contracts in two cases, one in BC cited by the firm (Century 21 v Rogers) and one in Quebec (Sutton Realty). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:00 pm
Facts In Lawson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm
Putting to one side that Judge Sutton and the Sixth Circuit created an embarrassing conflict in the circuits that was otherwise not present, I emphasized to my class the key fact that public opinion had moved so fast on the issue, that many more Americans today support the right to same-sex marriage than supported inter-racial marriage at the time of Loving v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm
In his opinion for 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, last November, upholding the constitutionality of state non-recognition of same-sex marriage and provoking the Supreme Court to take up the issue, Judge Jeffrey Sutton asserted that, “If it is constitutionally irrational to stand by the man-woman definition of marriage, it must be constitutionally irrational to stand by the monogamous definition of marriage. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:16 pm
Harkening to doubts expressed by Judge Sutton in his United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
See Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:55 pm
On the other hand, laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples long predate the era when most people even realized that homosexuals are a distinct group (as opposed to being essentially heterosexual people somehow tempted into what was considered sinful or antisocial behavior). [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am
Starting with his landmark opinion for the Court in Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:12 pm
Feeney, and Romer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Another good reason to review Judge Sutton’s opinion is how he aptly addresses both Loving v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Sutton) & Richard L. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Baird; Moore v. [read post]
