Search for: "People v Tiger" Results 101 - 120 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
This was demonstrated by the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision upholding a controversial six-month sentence for a man who collected three thousand dollars in support of the Tamil Tigers and was the first person convicted of financing terrorism. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:51 am by Florian Mueller
Unfortunately, some of the people shaping Europe's patent policy are now pushing for a Stone Age approach that makes patent injunctions a given in any case in which an infringement is identified, more than eight years after the eBay v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am by Benjamin Bissell
Reports from the region said as many as 75 people were killed in the ensuing conflagration, with many more suffering severe burns. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not sure he has new things to say about that general topic.Cathay Smith: In the ideal situation, would Rogers v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:46 am
We have however opened a reserve list for people who can come if someone else has to cancel (there are are usually a few on-the-day cancellations as work, illness and unexpected occurrences take their toll) so, if you've not yet signed up there might still be a chance for you. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> US v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:48 am by Patricia Salkin
Salton v Town of Mayfield Zoning Board of Appeals, 2-13 WL 1316363 (NYAD 3 Dept. 4/3/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/decisions/2014/516523.pdfFiled under: Accessory Uses, Current Caselaw - New York, Home Occupations, Non-Conforming Uses [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See also Hart, 717 F.3d at 155 (“‘a Lanham Act false endorsement claim is the federal equivalent of the right of publicity’”, taken from the Tiger Woods right of publicity case, ETW Corp. v. [read post]