Search for: "People v Trump"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 2:38 am
In one of the lawsuits, CREW v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:24 pm
Supreme Court ruling on DACA, Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 12:01 pm
In Kelly v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Donald Trump, et al. (23-CR-80101-AMC) New York (NY): The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am
I note how the recorded votes in Missouri v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:55 pm
Makaeff v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
“American democracy,” Biden said “is under attack because the defeated former president … refuses to accept the will of the people. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:45 am
Andrew Jennings blogs: The People v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
In 2017, in Matal v. [read post]
20 Apr 2025, 7:22 pm
The people who watched Trump’s television ads during sporting events had not been harmed by a transgender person, or by an immigrant, or by a woman of color. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:26 pm
Gutting the for-cause protections would make no appreciable difference in people's lives. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:29 pm
Jack Smith, the federal special counsel in the Trump Jan. 6 case (and Florida stolen classified documents case), has done his best to explain to the American people what kind of criminal occupied the White House from 2017 until early 2021. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:16 am
Indeed, the specifics of the indictment seem entirely immaterial to most people. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 2:45 pm
Anti-abortion politicians wasted no time going after Roe v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In the first, Matal v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:12 pm
The indictment in the election interference / hush money case is here: People of New York v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:23 am
A traditional PAC is different than the much newer super PAC, created by the Court of Appeals case Speechnow v. [read post]
