Search for: "People v Wearing" Results 101 - 120 of 2,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 12:05 pm
Of course I'm in favor of wearing seat belts, but not that long ago here in Texas a lot of people weren't. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:08 am
National Bank Assn.) and for the worst majority opinion (People v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 1:45 pm
In other words, can the state create a property interest that will allow it to prosecute people for wearing the wrong sort of T-shirts? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 11:36 am
 When you've got a 911 call of shots being fired, and respond to the scene five minutes later and see a guy who tends to match the description of the shooter, I can't fault the panel for holding (as it does) that you're allowed to stop the guy.I'll just add, however, that if four cops are allowed -- as the Ninth Circuit holds -- to draw their guns and order to the ground any black male between the ages of 17 and 26, and around 5'7 or 5'9, wearing a black… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
 Not just how she spends her time on vice, and what she wears on the job on Sepulveda, but also where she trains, how many sit-ups she can do, how fast she runs, her salary, her book, and so much more that I won't post. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:44 pm
 In other words, yeah, the Court expressly confirmed that there was no deadly weapon charge, but this guy who was thinking about defending himself should have known that the person wearing the black robes was totally wrong because he should have read and interpreted the complaint and transcript for himself -- things that would have made the right answer totally clear. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 8:09 am
Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County: People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:29 pm by David Super
Connecticut and particularly since Roe v. [read post]