Search for: "People v Word" Results 101 - 120 of 17,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
They also requested that the number of people with access be limited to 3 staff members. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
” Note the words “not possible,” which is to say “impossible. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  To add to these difficulties, people are living longer, which means they need their retirement income to last longer. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
The new wording in s.8 of the 2022 Act was inserted into the main piece of legislation, as s.114A Representation of the People Act 1983, which sets out the activities that fall within the offence. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]