Search for: "People v Works"
Results 101 - 120
of 27,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
According to Lady Hale, failing to exempt A from the “bedroom tax” was discriminatory “in the sense described in Thlimmenos v Greece: treating her like any other single parent with one child when in fact she ought to be treated differently” (at [75]). [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 8:38 pm
In Zavalin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:30 am
The article looks at one decision, Goins v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:43 pm
Which sort of works. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:20 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] Buchanan v Introjunction This was also the time that the plaintiff was unemployed [2] Queen v Cognos In this case, employment actually started but the concept could still apply on the facts discussed here. [3] Schwartz v Queen The post Fired Before Starting Work appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 10:20 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] Buchanan v Introjunction This was also the time that the plaintiff was unemployed [2] Queen v Cognos In this case, employment actually started but the concept could still apply on the facts discussed here. [3] Schwartz v Queen The post Fired Before Starting Work appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:37 am
Lots of people are writing on the major questions doctrine, and this symposium looks like a great way to showcase that work (they only want 1,000 to 7,000 word essays), extend on it, or preview other arguments and considerations that should be taken into account. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 12:26 pm
But the juror was a pastor of a Baptist church, dealt with homeless people a great deal, and his wife worked in the county welfare department. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
Here, Osborne's working on his own car, but the police -- who don't initially know whose car it is -- wrongfully think he might be stealing the stereo. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
In Cole v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
A distinctive style.Sometimes that works. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
Hoover v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:39 am
A good excuse to take off work early on this May Day, if you ask me.Alternately, if you want to stay at work but merely pretend to be productive, you can read this case. [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:16 am
A sense that's only highlighted by the fact that this case is entitled People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
The Queen on the application of Sharon Pantellerisco v DWP [2020] EWHC 1944 (Admin) - - https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/R-Pantellerisco-v-SSWP-Final-Approved.pdfThis judgment is now a few weeks old but is a great example of agencies working together to secure justice. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
Case citation: Ashton v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
What you are really pleading is "not guilty by reason of insanity," and the People are agreeing. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
I'm fine to let a jury decide.But it is my firm opinion that the relevant people in the Santa Clark County Sheriff's Office belong behind bars.Here's the basic scoop:"The Penal Code authorizes, but does not require, county sheriffs to issue licenses to carry concealed weapons to applicants who are of good moral character, have good cause for a license, reside or work in the county, and have completed a specified course of training. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 3:39 pm
Not novel or anything, but it works. [read post]
