Search for: "People v. Alvarez" Results 101 - 120 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Appx. 902, 905 (2d Cir. 2005) (noting that “deliberate falsehoods enjoy no First Amendment protection,” in the context of a prosecution for knowingly false statements on an immigration application); People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 11:05 pm by The Charge
  The prizes he received should not have been awarded because the judges should have known he was copying other people’s work. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:21 am by SHG
Because defendant is being prosecuted on the basis of false speech, rather than speech involving subversive political advocacy or speech designed to incite a riot (compare Penal Law § 240.08; People v Upshaw, 190 Misc 2d 704, 706-709 [NY City Crim Ct 2002]), Brandenburg and its progeny do not apply (compare United States v Alvarez, 567 US 709, 722 [2012]; see generally Tom Hentoff, Note, Speech, Harm, and Self-Government: Understanding the Ambit of the Clear… [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
When people commit fraud, they use different language. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:58 am
Therefore, MIC's motion for summary judgment should have been denied (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:52 am
Realities”Denisse Delgado Vázquez, University of Massachusetts, Boston, “Cuban Newcomers: Their Economic Behavior and Political Motivations”  [read post]