Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 101 - 120 of 5,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 11:24 am
Defendant ultimately presented the theory that he had killed Officer Mobilio in order to defend constitutionally guaranteed liberties that he believed the government was infringing, including the right to bear arms. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:26 pm
 Which, it bears mention, doesn't necessarily mean that the distinction is rational. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
 He's got a wallet belonging to Julie Skelton and a credit card that bears her name. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:04 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Portillo-Munoz that illegal aliens are not part of the "people" protected by the Second Amendment and thus have no constitutional right to bear arms. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
  Anecdotally some people in the industry seem to have perceived a decrease in filings, at least against their companies. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  And, unlike Judge VanDyke, before law school, I did not get a bachelor's degree in theology from Bear Valley Bible Institute. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:08 am
While the Constitution is in many ways a beautifully written document, the framers deserve no gold stars when it comes to how they phrased the Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
15 May 2010, 10:23 pm by Tung Yin
"V" was a remake of the deliciously campy 1980s miniseries (and sequel and subsequent TV series) about first contact with the Visitors, technologically advanced aliens who bear amazing gifts to humans. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
  Though, in that regard, it probably bears mention that this is the Fifth District. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
Upon our own review, it is apparent that the sketches bear a striking resemblance to the defendants. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:29 am by Josh Blackman
" And the state must justify its decision to deprive people of their right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
The panel opinion, which has now been vacated (as is always done when the court agrees to hear a case en banc) is here (Range v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:27 pm
Today the Supreme Court handed down District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Thus, primarily because of the "legal stigma" attached to warrantless and suspicionless stops, the People bear the burden of proving at a suppression hearing that the particular checkpoint in question was conducted in a non-discretionary manner, that is, the officers did not exercise individual discretion as to which cars to stop or what questions to ask akin to People v Cabrera. [read post]