Search for: "People v. Best (1983)" Results 101 - 120 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
§ 1983 or its common law backdrop and which has been demonstrated not to serve its policy goals, should be narrowed or abolished. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Thinking we would need to work our way through the details of complying with the current statutory conflict-of-interest safe harbors of Chapter 607, we consulted with Gary Teblum, my partner who was active in the recent revision of Chapter 607. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:15 am by Susan Letterman White
You have to demonstrate that you are the best lawyer for each particular client’s preferences for doing business. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:15 am by Susan Letterman White
You have to demonstrate that you are the best lawyer for each particular client’s preferences for doing business. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:18 am by Russell Knight
This should only be when there has been an incidence of domestic violence but people often resort to this extreme measure out of vitriol for the other parent. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
At best, he only argues the extraction choice was incorrect and that other dentists said extraction was unnecessary. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]