Search for: "People v. Black (1990)" Results 101 - 120 of 379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm by James Romoser
He sat down in the section reserved for white people, because the Black section was crowded and had water on the floor. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 9:12 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Niagara County's population is 7.3 percent black or African-American but only about 3 percent of people reporting for jury service in 2016 were black or African-American. [read post]
22 May 2023, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:32 am by Steve Hall
In 173 cases between 1990 and 2010, the study examined decisions involving 7,421 potential jurors (82 percent were white; 16 percent were black). [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
It was insured by Ohio Casualty from 1990-1992. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:41 am by Jamison Koehler
In what is probably the most widely cited case on this defense in the District, Acker v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
" After all, the IDEAA report takes the view that the "lesser black woman" statement (which in context seems to me to have simply meant "lesser than Sri Srinivasan, and chosen because she is a black woman") could be read as an insult to black women generally: His plain words not only explicitly identified the race, sex, and gender of a group of individuals (i.e., Black women) but also categorized Black women as "lesser. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]