Search for: "People v. Brown (1971)" Results 101 - 120 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In a 1971 release, the SEC “called attention to the requirements” under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 “for disclosure of legal proceedings and a description of the registrant’s business as these requirements relate to material matters involving the environment and civil rights. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
The idea that the fourteenth amendment is designed to dismantle caste and social subordination goes all the way back to the framing of the Fourteenth Amendment; it also appears in Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by John Dean
Brown (1999); and held similarly where there was a common hallway that required a separate key to enter the building in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Brown (1999); and held similarly where there was a common hallway that required a separate key to enter the building in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” [emphasis added]—John Irwin, Prisons in Turmoil (Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co., 1980)“In Furman v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The creation of the CICB in 1971 largely followed a British model created in 1964. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Similarly, the leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to a good name at Irish law require fair procedures by public bodies (eg, In re Haughey [1971] IR 217; Shatter v Guerin [2019] IESC 9 (26 February 2019)); but, again, the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation context. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:32 am by Anthony Gaughan
Harlan sidestepped questions (from pro-segregation senators) regarding the Brown v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am by Amy Howe
And in doing so, Gorsuch officially cast aside the “Lemon test,” a multi-pronged analysis derived from the 1971 decision Lemon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]