Search for: "People v. Brown (1981)" Results 101 - 120 of 145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
The gold and brown go together better than the mustard and brown of the San Diego Padres from the same era. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Ct. (1981) 119 CA 3d 534, 552 (pdf) and experts. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am by Katherine Gallo
Ct. (1981) 119 CA 3d 534, 552 (pdf) and experts.  [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
Most people can read an Arabic numeral even if they cannot read a particular language. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
Of course, Crosskey’s originalism was of no use to these people. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
App. 1981) (“under [the statute] there is no room for damages for personal injury and hence[] there can be no recovery . . . for mental pain and suffering”); Beerman v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
In government and academia, she has shown a special capacity to bring together people with deeply held, conflicting views. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am by Erin Miller
The romantic image of the Court as savior of African Americans derives largely from Brown v. [read post]