Search for: "People v. Chambers"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The people getting sued under the disability rights provisions of the ADA and FHA were not evil; they were negligent. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" In Powell v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
When examining whether mass surveillance measures are necessary and proportionate under Article 8 ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights has focused its review on whether appropriate safeguards against government abuse exist.While the Court has not recently carried out a balancing exercise between the benefits sought by mass surveillance and its impact on society, the Grand Chamber judgment from S. and Marper v. the U.K., a case in which the Court found unanimously that the… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:19 am
Self-confident people are usually not too concerned about what other people post on their social media pages. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:48 am
While social media can create echo chambers, it can also expose people to ideas they wouldn’t otherwise encounter. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Chair Gensler. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Following the Information Commissioner’s Order to release the information, the BBC appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber), arguing that disclosure would also “be likely to harm the commercial interests of MTM”. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Right, I am back from a two week holiday (it was lovely thank you) so onwards… Crescent Trustees Limited v Behjat. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am
Jehovah’s Witnesses and blood transfusions The Chamber of the ECtHR to which Pindo Mulla v Spain (application no. 15541/20) had been allocated has relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:56 am
In Biden v. [read post]
