Search for: "People v. Chambers (1998)"
Results 101 - 120
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The period addressed the dip between a new road opening and ‘people getting used to it’.The Court of Appeal held that:The general purpose of these provisions is, as the 1972 White Paper made clear, to strike a balance between public and private interests. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
Senior Counsel for Simpson & Marwick is Ian MacKay QC, Junior Counsel being Calum Wilson both of Compass Chambers. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Further, section 1 of the Defamation Act 1996 provides a defence of innocent dissemination to people who are not the author, editor or commercial publisher of a defamatory statement. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
“Conventional” qualified privilege In Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] EMLR 13, the Court of Appeal considered how the Human Rights Act 1998 affected a local authority’s defence of qualified privilege in a defamation case. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Henderson v [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
It goes back to 17 November 1998 when André Arthur was hosting a morning show on CKVL radio. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
It was not in accordance with the overriding objective under CPR 1998, SI 1998/3132, r 1.1 for the court to permit the parties to litigate issues which were not proportionate to the money involved. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
In Kearns v General Council of the Bar ([2003] 1 WLR 1357), the Bar Council had published a seriously defamatory statement circulated to all heads of chambers, senior clerks and practice managers in England and Wales. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
After the in-chambers meeting, Judge Edmon took the bench and called for the jury. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
After the in-chambers meeting, Judge Edmon took the bench and called for the jury. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
KJH v HGF [2010] EWHC 3064. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Heather Rogers QC is a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
But, under reference to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in Karakó v Hungary (Application No 39311/05) (unreported), given 28 April 2009, he submitted that article 8 does not confer a right to have your reputation protected from being affected by what other people say. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am
The Grand Chamber Hearings in Von Hannover v Germany and Axel Springer v Germany will be heard on 13 October 2010. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:10 am
Hence, the battle lines are drawn: Sink/Individuals v. [read post]
