Search for: "People v. Conte"
Results 101 - 120
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 3:11 pm
.' In support of the foregoing contention, the accused alludes to People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:44 pm
For the reasons set forth above, the court does not believe that was the intended purpose of CPL § 180.50 and refuses to adopt the People's argument. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 2:25 pm
Defendant's appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order from which the appeal is taken is not adverse or partially adverse within the meaning of CPL 450.90(1) as in People v Edwards. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm
As noted in People v Paul, whether a foundation for the experience and training is set forth or not, it seems that, as a matter of fundamental fairness, defendant should not have to proceed to trial in a narcotics case unless and until a laboratory report has been filed by the People. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
In respect to the other phases of the Appellate Division's power to lessen or suspend the sentence in this case, an affirmative answer is found, among others, in People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
Whereas in the present case, a criminal statute employs the word 'false', it requires proof of something more than the untrue. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:14 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 2:30 pm
People, 62 N.Y. 299. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:57 am
To Be Cont.. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 pm
The court concludes that the signed and sworn supporting affidavit of the burglary victim constituted reliable hearsay and/or a relevant statement of any victim under Correction Law § 168-n [3], and that the court was entitled to consider and rely on such evidence as clear and convincing proof that defendant is a level three risk as ruled in People v Saleemi, People v Victor, People v Jimenez and People v Salaam. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Since a Florida youthful offender would have to register as a sex offender in Florida, the proceeding would be considered a conviction under SORA, even though a New York youthful offender would not have to register as held in People v Kuey and People v Coolbaugh. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
In the event Defendant should wish to seek reclassification or to be relieved of any further duty to register under Correction Law § 168-o there apparently exists no record to permit adequate judicial review as held in People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm
To Be Cont... [read post]
