Search for: "People v. County of Santa Clara"
Results 101 - 120
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
We provide free legal consultations for bankruptcy in San Francisco County, Sacramento County, Alameda County, Contra Costa County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Stanislaus County, San Joaquin County, Marin County, Solano County and throughout Northern California. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:07 pm
The newspaper reports that about 7,000 people are arrested for DUI every year in Santa Clara County and many may have already entered guilty or no contest pleas, paid fines, served jail time and had to adhere to other conditions even though they weren't guilty. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:08 pm
The Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office said recently it would review the cases of 865 DUI suspects because San Jose police officers use the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer as part of their field sobriety testing of drivers they believe to be intoxicated. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:08 pm
The Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office said recently it would review the cases of 865 DUI suspects because San Jose police officers use the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer as part of their field sobriety testing of drivers they believe to be intoxicated. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was way back in 1886 that the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 8:15 am
The Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office announced it will review cases over a month to determine how many to drop after officers used the Alco-Sensor V breathalyzer as part of field sobriety tests. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:10 pm
The Santa Clara County District Attorney's Office said it would undertake a month-long review process to determine how many cases it would drop as a result of the defect. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
County of Santa Clara The controversy was reignited in part by the United States Supreme Court’s recent refusal to hear the appeal of a California Supreme Court decision holding that the government can hire private attorneys on a contingenct basis under certain circumstances. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:34 am
Santa Clara County, California, 22 Fla. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Santa Clara County, holding that health care centers that primarily serve the poor cannot sue drug companies for overcharging them. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
County of Santa Clara. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740 and County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:15 pm
After hearing, the Superior Court (Santa Clara County Superior, Judge Elfving) denied the petition and entered judgment for DLSE.On appeal, Heritage argued that its alleged inadvertence should have been a defense to the citation and that a mitigated penalty should have applied. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Santa Clara County, it considered whether federal courts can confer a private right of action for breach of contract on third-party beneficiaries of a government contract when the statute mandating the contract does not contain a cause of action. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Santa Clara County, it considered whether federal courts can confer a private right of action for breach of contract on third-party beneficiaries of a government contract when the statute mandating the contract does not contain a cause of action. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
In Holmes v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Santa Clara County, which clears the way for “cities and counties to hire private lawyers, and offer them a share of the proceeds, when suing companies for the huge costs of cleaning up lead paint. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
It is not hard to find local counsel to pursue a subpoena in Santa Clara County, California, and to sign a response to a motion to quash prepared by lead counsel elsewhere, if such a motion is filed (note that the Doe defendant has to find a lawyer in California, too). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:41 am
County of Santa Clara v. [read post]