Search for: "People v. Courts (1985)" Results 101 - 120 of 1,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
Westminster’s argument, the High Court found, had already been rejected in R (Alemi) v Westminster City Council (2015) EWHC 1765 (Admin) (our note). [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 11:51 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Gray, 478 So.2d 17 (Fla.1985) (allowing recovery where plaintiff is in the “sensory perception” of physical injuries sustained by a close family member); Kush v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
LSO v Widz[1] In Law Society of Ontario v Widz, 2022 ONLSTH 140, the issue was the penalty for a lawyer’s abuse of his partner. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rev. 257 (1985) published as part of a symposium (of course) on voting rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And this produced the Court that decided Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
The court will consider the extent to which a provision providing that the landlord may reasonably determine the tenant’s share of service charges in a residential lease is invalidated or affected by section 27A (6) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:54 am
 In Heckler v Cheney, the Supreme Court held in 1985 that "an agency's decision not to prosecute or enforce...is a decision generally committed to an agency's absolute discretion". [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:03 pm by Everspark Developer
Greber, 760 F.2d 68 (3rd Cit. 1985), the court held that even attempting to induce referrals can constitute a violation. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
McLellan v Birbilis In McLellan v Birbilis, 2021 ONSC 7084, Justice Nicole Tellier debunked (again!) [read post]