Search for: "People v. Davis (1996)" Results 101 - 120 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 9:20 am by Terry Lenamon / Reba Kennedy
Many have come to know about the AEDPA (Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ) because of the Troy Davis case (read our earlier post here). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am by Steve Hall
In the peak year of 1996, 315 people received death sentences. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  In 1996, 315 people were sentenced to die; last year, only 114 were. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
In Contractreal v Davies [2001] EWCA Civ 928, the CA appears to have doubted that s.81 could help with the interpretation of a covenant like this where the lease pre-dated the coming into force of s.81, 1996 Act (presumably on the basis that no-one could have contemplated such a meaning when the lease was granted). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:49 am by J
In Contractreal v Davies [2001] EWCA Civ 928, the CA appears to have doubted that s.81 could help with the interpretation of a covenant like this where the lease pre-dated the coming into force of s.81, 1996 Act (presumably on the basis that no-one could have contemplated such a meaning when the lease was granted). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm by Gideon
No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
There is also an implied term in every employment contract that an employer will provide reasonable support to ensure that the employee can carry out his/her duties without harassment or disruption by fellow employees, following the case of Wigan Borough Council v Davies [1979] ICR 411. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm by Josh Blackman
Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 634 (1996) (“To the extent Davis held that a convicted felon may be denied the right to vote, its holding is not implicated by our decision and is unexceptionable. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]