Search for: "People v. Day (1992)" Results 101 - 120 of 898
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The trial, which took place one year later, culminated in acquittals of the four officers who were charged,[1] in reaction to which thousands of people took part in five days of civil disturbances known variously as the LA Uprising or the LA riots of 1992. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Such an argument, made by Justices Black, Douglas, and Goldberg, didn't carry the day as to public official libel lawsuits in New York Times v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
The only reasoned decisions I could find, the nonprecedential National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Notably, in 1992, Blackmun dissented in part in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
In a 1992 Washington Post column, Hentoff described how activists would prevent his even leading discussions of the issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was reaffirmed in 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The morning of the last day of the symposium, on Friday, was devoted to a number of different performances of the courtroom scene from The Merchant of Venice and the analogous scene from Wesker’s play, directed by Miller himself, a high honor (or so I thought). [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 1:44 am by Jeanne Huang
First Instance where a Mainland China Civil Mediation Decision has been Recognized and Enforced in New South Wales, Australia   I Introduction   Bank of China Limited v Chen [2022] NSWSC 749 (‘Bank of China v Chen’), decided on the 7 June 2022, is the first instance where the New South Wales Supreme Court (‘NSWSC’) has recognised and enforced a Chinese civil mediation decision (i.e.,?????). [read post]
After 19 days of public hearings producing a 10,000-page record, the Commission concluded that NEPA did not require the SEC to mandate such disclosures, and the courts later agreed.[7] While the SEC in the 1971 release had limited disclosure to “material matters,” in 1975 the Commission mandated disclosure of all environmental proceedings to which a government was a party, whether or not the amounts at issue were material. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
 Between August 2016 and January 2017, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. [read post]