Search for: "People v. Deems"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2018, 8:33 am
A subsequent enactment that is inconsistent with an earlier enactment is deemed to impliedly repeal the earlier enactment to the extent of the inconsistency. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
People fear crime. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 4:34 pm
People v Watkins, 10 AD3d 665, 665-666, lv denied 3 NY3d 761). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:46 pm
This, along with the Ledbetter v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
It’s fairly well-accepted that pretty people have an edge – greater popularity, higher grades, more job opportunities, more positive reviews, higher salaries – they’re even punished less harshly by the criminal justice system for the same crimes as people generally deemed less attractive. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:34 am
In the case of Hibshman v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
In Robert Young v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
In Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:19 am
Accordingly, we might say Article V, in theory, supports the view that here the people rule, while in fact orchestrating a significantly different story. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
(State laws on any subject must comply with federal constitutional principles that have been deemed applicable to the states.) [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 5:00 am
Stambovsky v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
People v Kirkland, 89 NY2d 903, 904–905). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 8:41 am
Brought to us in the case of People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 am
In Tamara Smith v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:41 pm
In other jurisdictions, defendants who continue prosecution of their appeals through representation of counsel are not deemed unavailable to obey the mandate of the court (see People v Puluc-Sique, 182 Cal App 4th 894, 899 [Ct App 2010]). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Under the 1996 case of People v. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 2:27 am
In some cases, it may be deemed significant. [read post]
