Search for: "People v. Diamond" Results 101 - 120 of 325
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Could have made a categorical exclusion, but it didn’t do that.Viewpoint v. content based. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:49 am by Jessica C. Diamond
  Just ask the Plaintiff in the recent case out of New York State, Crocker C. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:01 am by Joe Mullin
Competing Diamond Companies GemShares was created in 2008 to market “diamond investment products. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am by Jon Penney
  The answer is complicated but likely lies in the present (thin) state of research on these issues, but also common conceptions, and misconceptions, about surveillance and impact on people and broader society. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 2:16 am by CFM Admin
The second ICO was marketed similarly but with respect to the diamond industry. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:29 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
“[T}rivial copying does not constitute actionable infringement” Newton v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:09 am
 In other words, the word "sovereign" when used for gold commemorative coins:(i) designates the the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, the time of production of goods or of rendering of services, or other characteristics of goods or services; and(ii) consists exclusively of signs or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade.Whilst "Sovereign" can mean many… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]