Search for: "People v. England"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2008, 4:38 pm
Surprisingly, but thankfully, the New England Journal of Medicine felt so strongly about the effort to shield pharmaceutical medical device manufacturers from liability, they filed an unsolicited brief with the United States Supreme Court in a case called Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
The proper construction of s 1(1) The background to this issue, and to the enactment of s 1(1), is the judgment in Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC (QB) 1414, in which Tugendhat J considered that there was a “threshold of seriousness” recognised under common law, and in which he favoured a definition that a statement was defamatory if it “… substantially affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards [the… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:14 am
The case is Kelly v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
In 1986, the Delaware Chancery Court said in Katz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Representation of the People Act 1918 Mari Takayanagi15. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:30 am
This SI only applies to England. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm
BT and Dramatico v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:19 am
There are a lot of people who take to the slopes in Massachusetts and throughout New England each year. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:19 am
There are a lot of people who take to the slopes in Massachusetts and throughout New England each year. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:32 am
Case Citation: State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
The people have made their unequivocal choice.Today we will sign treaties on the accession of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, Zaporozhye Region and Kherson Region to the Russian Federation. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:03 am
Why did the claim in Lee v Brown fail? [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
As we waited last night for England to go 3-1 up in The Ashes there were some amusing jokes about our cousins from OZ...who don’t enjoy losing at anything, but particularly not cricket against England. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
Essex Trading Standards v Wallati Singh [2009] EWHC 520 (Admin) is a Divisional Court (England and Wales) decision from 3 March which the IPKat nearly missed completely. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:41 am
Compare Kanter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Submissions are sought from a very wide range of people and institutions, including the catch-all “members of the public”. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:21 am
Teen in accident defies the odds, walks again, November 20, 2016, Fox News More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
You can’t have such incompetent people driving taxis, people who know so little about the city, and think that they took actual exams. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 1:25 pm
The decision in Reilly & Wilson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
