Search for: "People v. Foote"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,672
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
” Sharp v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:00 pm
The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:17 pm
Landing Pages v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
(Presumably because, I don't know, maybe the Legislature is worried about people accidentally hitting the drone.) [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
After NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The FTC asked OpenAI to provide detailed descriptions of all complaints it had received of products making “false, misleading, disparaging or harmful” statements about people. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Magliocca's Prawfsblawg post focuses on the Supreme Court's 1947 decision in Kotch v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am
Before and since Bakke, we also have had a (larger but still quite small) group of people willing to put a thumb (rarely a foot) on the scales in favor of people of color. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
Last month, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Haaland v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:15 am
Somin's "Free to Move" discusses how broadening opportunities for foot voting can greatly enhance political liberty for millions of people around the world. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
She learned she was pregnant just days before the United States Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm
Yesterday the Court reversed in Mallory v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:42 am
You really want people switching between abc and 123 when your whole field of vision is available? [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
