Search for: "People v. Free (1982)" Results 101 - 120 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
I add only that Congress, having enacted 42 U.S.C. 1982, remains free to amend it at any time. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Judges do not lose entirely their rights to free speech, but it is well established that the preservation of the integrity and of the public perception of the judiciary justifies certain infringements on a judge's right to speak out (emphasis added). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The rapid emergence of COVID-19 creates new challenges for the nation’s patchwork of state run workplace benefit delivery systems. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:03 pm by Josh Blackman
For example, the Ninth Circuit held that the Fifth Circuit erred in Texas v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The State does have a compelling interest in "ensuring that jurors remain free from threats and intimidation directly resulting from their duty to serve. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 6:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Stewart complied with the condition of entry, he was free to enter Allan Gardens and free to express himself without the use of violence or threats of violence. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
People remained free to keep handguns they had registered in the District of Columbia before 1976, and in the City of Chicago before 1982. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am by Eugene Volokh
§§ 1981 & 1982, the federal statutes that have been read as banning discrimination in contracting and property transactions based on race or ethnicity (including discrimination based on the target's being Jewish). [read post]