Search for: "People v. Gay"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:34 pm
I know that everyone wants to read the Ninth Circuit's gay marriage decision that came down today. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am
To the contrary, I think that gay people do have a constitutional right to marry under the Fourteenth Amendment, and I also think that gay marriage is desirable for policy reasons. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
It is at least questionable whether people consider gay marriage with abhorrence. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 10:49 am
In Prowel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:40 pm
Lots of gay and straight people would be “more successful getting married and raising a family. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
People of all sexual orientations, gay, straight or bi-sexual, can and do support gay marriage. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
People of all sexual orientations, gay, straight or bi-sexual, can and do support gay marriage. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
But a couple of a former wife’s siblings are openly gay, as are some people I call my friends and so this issue impacts people I know and love. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:31 pm
The attorneys acknowledged that some people hold religious objections to same-sex marriage. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:05 pm
Reed case involving disclosure of the names of people signing a referendum concerning Washington State’s gay rights law. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:08 pm
Maybe they'd call it a "gay rage" case. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:17 am
Bernier v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
The intensity with which gay people have been despised in American culture is well documented, and scholarship has now dispelled Antonin Scalia's ignorant claim in his Romer v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 am
On the other hand, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hurley v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:52 am
[The case finally showed up on Westlaw on August 8: People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:06 am
Kennedy was also the author of a broader gay rights ruling in 2003, Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 12:35 pm
In her concurring opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:52 am
There is apparently a split in Ohio among the appellate courts - this decision, State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
This was, of course, not a holding that anti-gay legislation does not merit a higher standard of review, but merely a ruling that Amendment 2 would fall to the lowest standard of review, because the Court saw the amendment as a product of pure animus against gay people, and had previously held in cases on other subjects that pure animus against a particular class of people is never a legitimate basis for discriminatory legislation. [read post]
