Search for: "People v. Hill" Results 101 - 120 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit, with a pretty tough panel (Chief Judge Edmondson, and Judges Tjoflat and Hill) affirmed a below guidelines sentence in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
I think we can all agree that, emotionally, you've got a pretty steep hill to climb -- regardless of the potential merits of your arguments -- in convincing the Ninth Circuit that you deserve relief.Let me also add that you don't do yourself any favors, Ted, by representing yourself. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm by Mark Litwak
 You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in redistricting cases from Virginia and North Carolina, Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supp. 2d 233, 253 n.14 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) and as connoting a racial meaning, see Hill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Big Pork bet against these trends and lost—first with people who voted for change, and then in the courts. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:12 am
• Carolyn Elefant's (Legal Blog Watch) recent post on Arbor Hill v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
"The best thing I can do is help people realize there's a change that's needed to prevent this from happening again. [read post]