Search for: "People v. Humphrey"
Results 101 - 120
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Humphrey applies when federal habeas relief was unavailable as a practical matter to a Section 1983 plaintiff. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bond v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
Consider: the same lawyers who parse every word of the great statements by Abraham Lincoln and John Bingham during the First Reconstruction completely ignore comparable speeches by Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey during the Second Reconstruction. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
Dept. of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 544 (7th Cir.1995) (adopting a presumption against working from home except in “extraordinary circumstances”) with Humphrey v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR identifies the principal catalysts of the revolution as Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Nixon, Everett McKinley Dirksen, and Dr. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:05 am
Threatening to harshly criticize people’s acti [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
There, the person accused was convicted of defrauding different people than the indictment alleged he defrauded. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
The Civil Rights Revolution transformed the Constitution, but not through judicial activism or Article V amendments. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:00 pm
The latest decision in our old friend, Astiana v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
., Jr. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am
California Coastal Commission (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
