Search for: "People v. James (1987)" Results 101 - 120 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  Once general principles of institutional structures are understood, it is possible to contextualize these insights within the realities of the American Republic--the general government, the administrative branches, inferior political units, and the residuary role of the people as ultimate sovereigns. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
  I took the liberty of saying “yes” as in, for example, James F. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
 The problem, however, is that some people just don’t much like being “n [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
In December 2003, then-Deputy Attorney General James Comey appointed Patrick J. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider that the lawyer Trump hired to defend him against a charge that he incited violence against peaceful protesters at a campaign event cited Clinton v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
The second most important protection for a grand jury witness is the Fifth Amendment.[6]  Unfortunately, business people, public officials, professionals and other white-collar types are loath to rely on the Fifth Amendment, concluding – with justification – that most people believe that one who invokes his or her Fifth Amendment rights is guilty of something. [read post]