Search for: "People v. Kavanaugh"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
But Justice Brett Kavanaugh seemed to propose an alternative that might satisfy some of his colleagues. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
Sackett v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:05 am
There Chief Justice John Roberts cited then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Casey had followed Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 1:29 pm
Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 12:28 pm
More broadly, Bruen instructed lower courts to decide Second Amendment cases the way that Court had decided District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 1:01 am
Thus, for example, Justice Kavanaugh, concurring in the 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
Yet he emphasizes that "we don't always line up 6-3, 5-4, the way some people tend to think. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
And from the paper: [Morton v.] [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In Kanter v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
After NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
And from the paper: [Morton v.] [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Justice Gorsuch was silent, as were Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett, letting this precedent of the Fourth Circuit stand Third, in Kincaid v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
With its decision in Sackett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. [read post]