Search for: "People v. Leahy" Results 101 - 120 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
  But on the long list of To-Dos, after buy more Cheddar Bunnies, most people do not have “File baby’s name as a trade mark with the USPTO”. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm by Jennifer Granick
  Artists have legitimate reasons to use existing images beyond just to parody them or comment directly upon them and Cariou v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
Patrick Leahy forced former NSA director Keith Alexander to admit that the “54 attacks” claim was inaccurate in front of Congress. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
– Beijing First Intermediate People’s Court accepts admin lawsuit lodged by Louis Vuitton against China Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (China Law Insight) Core IP issues in M&A and investment (Part II of II) (China Law Insight) ‘Patent Litigation in China’ The book. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]