Search for: "People v. Leeds"
Results 101 - 120
of 122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
Green Building Association’s LEED ™ standards. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:33 am
Bailey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
Under her leadership, the OSFC initiated the design and construction of over 250 schools undergoing LEED certification with the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:16 pm
Also amazing: almost half of people who buy counterfeits end up buying the real thing. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Shehaj v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
(Alabama), Clive Walker (Leeds, England), Russell L. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
As mentioned earlier in the week, Facebook has changed their privacy settings; once again, the social network has people concerned. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:36 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
(This doesn't seem to go to sponsorship of communications v. sponsorship of products and services.) [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:16 pm
On the one hand, the industry is growing and people are incredibly protective of the certification systems, like LEED. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:00 am
Butt v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:00 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
Now as I see it surely the damage suffered by Leeds United (and Neil Warnock etc) is too remote? [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:31 pm
Are people frightened of me? [read post]
