Search for: "People v. Manis"
Results 101 - 120
of 30,459
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
See all those clubs hit other people? [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:13 pm
The prosecutor referenced defendant’s admission to lying and the instruction allowing the jury to “consider that” in determining guilt and then listed many of the lies defendant testified she had told Meux. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 11:43 am
Nine years after Bakke, McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 3:50 pm
The smartphone has a GPS in it (like many such phones), and the owner consents to have Sprint "ping" it, which reveals its location: in the possession of defendant. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 1:41 pm
You don't see many convictions like the one in today's opinion, which was for "attempting to take another person from the lawful custody of a peace officer by means of a riot in violation of Penal Code sections 405a and 664. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Indeed, there's not even a body, and the evidence of Christie's death is a lot less than in many no-body cases.) [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Lafleur v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
In 1964, in Reynolds v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:03 pm
(Unless you happen to live near the Tehachapi prison.)This is nonetheless one of those (many) cases that makes you wonder about whether it really makes sense to let people represent themselves. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
But it's still the state's fault -- and a continuing one, at that -- that many defendants in criminal cases in Riverside don't get a speedy trial. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 12:18 pm
The concept of premises liability applies, though many people refer to accidents as “slip and falls” because of how they happen. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:33 am
Street v Mumford ruled that the tenant can refuse anyone access to the property, even the Landlord. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:17 am
While we wait for the next big Section 230 ruling (so many cases are on appeal!) [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
Because so many powerful and influential people made these arguments, mainstream media felt compelled to treat them as serious legal claims and this also helped support their reasonableness.The composition of the federal bench also matters, because an argument is more likely to be thought plausible, and possibly succeed, if many federal judges are likely to entertain it and take it seriously.Let's apply this analysis to Texas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:51 am
This news is already everywhere, but in case you haven’t heard, the SCOTUS held yesterday in Padilla v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
There are so many other vapid, utterly pathetic belt buckles out there. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
Co., People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:06 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
