Search for: "People v. Maxwell"
Results 101 - 120
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Intellectual Property Watch is a much-valued service to the IP community worldwide -- but it's not sufficiently valued for people to give it adequate funding. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
Last week the IPKat reported on the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-462/09 Thuiskopie v Opus. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Yes, if the following conditions are met (People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Universal Pictures, as precedent.Nichols v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:09 pm
The contribution of this member of the blog team, being a little note on one of his favourite cases -- Case C-208/09 Ilonka Sayn-Wittgenstein v Landeshauptmann von Wien, Court of Justice of the European Union (Second Chamber), 22 December 2010 -- can be read here. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Moore was not charged in the Maxwell case. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
Moore was not charged in the Maxwell case. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:40 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Medicaid Services: SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE IF CALIFORNIA CAN CUT MEDICAID PAYMENTS, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, and Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital, and Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Basketball superstars Jordan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
v=u0lPuN03b40 Dr. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:02 pm
See Katz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
The only people to have colleges named after them in both Oxford and Cambridge are Jesus, St John, Wolfson ... and CATS! [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
This is Part 1 of an edited extract from a paper presented to the 22nd Sweet & Maxwell Annual Judicial Review Conference on 19 November 2010. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:32 pm
Furthermore, the result of the decision in Thornton v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
This is the concluding part of a paper delivered at the JUSTICE/Sweet and Maxwell Human Rights conference on 20 October 2010. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
