Search for: "People v. Perry"
Results 101 - 120
of 786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion (by Circuit Judge Reinhardt) in Perry v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:32 pm
The ACLU's Northern California chapter, which supports [plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:11 am
You’ve got to have people in the classrooms—that’s your first priority. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:26 am
Perry and Randall v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
The lawsuit, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:18 pm
My initial reaction to the Ninth Circuit panel's decision today in Perry v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:16 pm
The Court issued its most recent opinion, People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
Adler) On Thursday, Judge Vaughn Walker denied gay marraige opponents’ motion for a stay of his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:32 am
Chief Judge Vaughn Walker's decision in Perry v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:05 pm
The case is Nabors Wells Servs. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Loving v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 9:18 am
The San Francisco Chronicle reported yesterday that Judge Vaughn Walker of US District Court in San Francisco has denied a motion by the Proposition 8 Proponents, Intervenor-Defendants in Perry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
By Mike Dorf Last week's Supreme Court decision in Perry v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court in 1869, ruled that Texas did NOT have a right to secede, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Landry (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 785, 791 [California Supreme Court interpretation of federal law binding when there is “no contrary United States Supreme Court decision” on the issue]; see also Perry v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 6:18 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
In Perry v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
