Search for: "People v. Pettis"
Results 101 - 120
of 481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
” Berkson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
Most are entirely decent people. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
Thus, 6th Amendment protections do not apply to: proceedings involving "petty" (as opposed to "serious") crimes, as measured by the length of the authorized prison term, Muniz v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
People can go to jail for these speech acts notwithstanding the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:08 am
“We never get accustomed to being less important to other people than they are to us. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm
(The leading case on this is D.C. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm
"We do not sentence people to be stabbed and beaten. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 5:01 am
Kaflowitz, Smith, and Tyshchenko; and I should stress that many people have faced wrongful charges that were much more perilous than the petty disorderly conduct charge that I was facing. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
And, intelligent people cuss more. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
And, intelligent people cuss more. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
And, intelligent people cuss more. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
The system, which is still in use today, relies on federal magistrate judges, who are empowered to handle cases involving petty offenses like illegal entry. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:21 pm
This new issue is petty. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
City of Boca Ratonand Burlington Industries v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am
But these are, at worst, petty distinctions. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
Yet our mostly tolerant society, built upon trust in our leaders, seems focused on petty personal attacks that risk throwing out that most valuable commodity in any [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:50 pm
Thomas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am
Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution prohibits “Bill[s] of Attainder,” laws that, under Supreme Court precedent, “legislatively determine[] guilt and inflict[] punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial” (Nixon v. [read post]
