Search for: "People v. Poore (1982)" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
All of this was decided by the people in the form of the US Constitution. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
People want these protections provided by that professional status of a lawyer. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:26 am
Supreme Court has indeed ruled on laws of this nature, drawing the conclusion that you cite above in the 1982 Enmund v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm by Norman L. Eisen
However, based on what is known so far, it represents poor judgment—especially in a case of this magnitude, even if a prosecutor’s private life is generally none of the public’s business. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
  It invites juries to decide cases on improper bases – that all these people wouldn’t be suing unless something was wrong. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
V: Some Food for Thought The most effective method lies in using an economic incentive theory, like a tax, incorporated into an already existing infrastructure for enforcement. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm by JURIST Staff
Hundreds of people took to the streets in Accra to join the pro-Palestine protest following Israel’s retaliation. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Enfranchisement of Indigenous people did not fully occur until 1960. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
  Impose duty to monitor the markets they make; compliance of users, the quality and conduct of the people and businesses that use the platform. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
There is no longer any defense available for these people. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am by David Kris
There are lots of young, fit, good-looking people playing volleyball or working out. [read post]