Search for: "People v. Price (1989)"
Results 101 - 120
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
Several of these court rulings were based, at least in part, on a Supreme Court decision about discrimination on the basis of “sex stereotyping,” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
1989 court wasn’t successful because overtaken by general changes in civil litigation. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court ruled in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Hopkins (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that reliance on sex-role stereotyping can be an actionable form of employment discrimination. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:50 pm
However, in 1989 in Tock, the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously recognized Rylands v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
" The panel cited the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Qualified Immunity In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:10 am
That last case — Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 11:10 am
That last case — Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
The plaintiffs argue that their cases are thus analogous to Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am
Bastiaan Assink: In passing, the court also says a thing or two about Chancellor Allen's much overlooked 1989 TW Services decision and the ongoing debate about director primacy v. shareholder primacy between the Marty Lipton's (the board!) [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
The major point of Professor Stone‘s article is that, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
[See, See R. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
” People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
"[8] In Europe, the term, "gray market" applies to goods sold outside the European Economic Area (hereinafter "EEA") and then re-imported against the wishes of their copyright holder.[9] The gray market has the potential to harm more than just the reputation of the goods being sold, although reputational harm has served as the basis for most innovators' arguments.[10] When a manufacturer sells goods to distributors abroad, it often does so at… [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
Lew, 875 F.2d 219, 221 (9th Cir. 1989). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
After considering the alleged $23 million-a-year price tag associated with this ruling for defenders alone, the quite sensible response from state lawmakers was: Don’t send so many people to jail in the first place. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v. [read post]
