Search for: "People v. Render"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:46 pm
This is pursuant to CPL 470.05[2] and the court’s ruling in the case of People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:29 am
Mussenden, 308 N.Y. 558, 127 N.E.2d 551; see also, People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645, 650 [1979]; People v Rentz, 67 NY2d 829, 831 [1986]). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:51 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 6:18 am
My article, Courts, Backlash, and Social Change: Learning from the History of Prigg v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
The Supreme Court rendered a decision June 20, 2011, in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 9:56 am
It would appear it may offer relief to people indicted in Federal Court or those convicted but whose have not become final. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 6:06 pm
In addition, we conclude that the prejudicial effect of the evidence concerning the prior crimes outweighed its probative value (see generally People v Hudy, 73 NY2d 40, 55, abrogated on other grounds by Carmell v Texas, 529 US 513). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:15 am
People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 2:25 pm
People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 1:04 am
The Illinois Supreme Court’s single-paragraph opinion in Keating v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
He fractured his cervical vertebrae rendering him tetraplegic. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
This is an important statement because many people, such as the majority of the Federal Circuit panel in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Hansen Chavis, a federal public defender, told the justices that interpreting the law to apply only to federal clemency would render its language meaningless in many cases, as people convicted of state crimes are not eligible for federal clemency. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Friday a Hinds County jury rendered a $100,000 verdict Friday in Marble v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
