Search for: "People v. Sharp" Results 101 - 120 of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It would  be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The number of people answering "not in favor" to Gallup's poorly worded basic question is the highest it has been since before Furman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by Rick Garnett
It is both misguided and quixotic, then, to employ the First Amendment to smooth out the bumps and divisions that are an unavoidable part of the political life of a diverse and free people. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Associated Newspapers Ltd, R (on the application of) v Rt Hon Lord Justice Leveson [2012] EWHC 57 – Read judgment On Friday 20 January 2012 the Administrative Court dismissed the second application for judicial review of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But the two opinions also express seemingly sharp disagreement on stare decisis. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]