Search for: "People v. Shepard" Results 101 - 120 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2007, 7:48 am
Fortunately, the number of people receiving the newsletter has increased. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:20 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:37 am
Francis Drive, Suite 101 Santa Fe, NM 87(505) 4083 Phone: (505) 827-7584 (V/TTY); (800) 489-8536 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NM only) E-mail: NMCDHHA@doh.state.nm.us Web: http://www.nmcdhh.org Educational Resource Center on Deafness New Mexico School for the Deaf 1060 Cerrillos Road Santa Fe, NM 87503 Phone: (505) 476-6400 (V/TTY); (800) 841-6699 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Telecommunications Relay Services for Individuals who are Deaf, Hard of Hearing, or with Speech Impairments… [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:00 pm
From some quick research, the root seems to be in a case written by Chief Justice Shepard in 1999, Sensback v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 4:53 am
We studied events like the Holocaust, the tragedy of Matthew Shepard and the Civil Rights movement. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:01 am
Significantly, the court described litigation in a state case, People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:27 am
Dumanski WESTCHESTER COUNTYCriminal Practice Gas Station Violated GBL §396-r, Executive Law §63 Enjoined From Capitalizing on Market Disruptions People v. [read post]