Search for: "People v. Shorts"
Results 101 - 120
of 8,405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 8:27 am
Launched in July 2006, Twitter was the first major ‘micro-blogging’ service, allowing people to use the internet to post very short blogposts. 2. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:32 am
There are presumably many reasons why rich people transfer their home to "corporations" they control. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:01 pm
A short time later, Lopez managed to get out of the car. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
The defendants argued that the SEC attributed misstatements to Schwab entities in general, rather than to specific people. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 7:34 am
Spencer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:54 am
In Ezell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:04 pm
Unsurprisingly, and with a concise ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City cut short the reviews of an arbitral award the government of Laos sought to challenge in the matter Thai-Lao Lignite v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
" Proving once and for all that some people don't actually know lyrics very well. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Just as a quick follow up to Jeff Schmitt’s post below, it is worth pointing out Justice Anthony Kennedy’s very short but extremely unusual concurring opinion in Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:21 am
The question raised in Smith v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
In the Landmark cases -- known as People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
Some people are happy with short, concise opinions that read (to me) more as advocacy summaries than as opinions; others take a contrary view. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Justice Kennard's opinion on this point is pretty short (five double-spaced pages) and worth a quick read. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
Part I tells the story of Colegrove v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
In short, the victimization resulted from the third party’s placement of the ad, not because Backpage profiting from the ad placement. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:17 am
The ruling in the case of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
