Search for: "People v. Stamps"
Results 101 - 120
of 804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2022, 11:42 am
The ROSS v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
Shapiro wrote: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:59 am
The days of Griggs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
See Tandon v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:26 am
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Garland v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
"But such deference cannot be an excuse for the Court to abdicate its duty to protect the constitutional rights of all people. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm
Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
They produce counterfeit cigarettes with the look and feel of legitimate brands and sell them with counterfeit tax stamps. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
Sandford, Plessy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 5:15 am
In Califano v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:43 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
But courts shouldn't permit suits against people who aren't legally liable in them, just because it solves someone else's legal problems. * * * United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:43 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Facebook v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 6:00 pm
In Patkaciunas v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 8:21 am
But several days ago, in Black Voters Matter Fun v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
